I don't think anyone is especially "desperate", Mr Adams, least of all Seán Manchester.
There is, however, a matter of harassment, cyberstalking, copyright theft, privacy violation, malicious falsehood, fraud and one or two other offences which you need to face.
Now how can you do that if you're hiding away?
Come out, come out, wherever you are, Mr Adams.
There's a list of serious charges waiting to be read out to you once you have come out of hiding.
Do please have a nice day.
HATRED UNLIMITED - PART 1
1)Neither Barbara or Catherine had even heard of IG until he phoned Catherine. He phoned about your fake post giving C's private details and photo on Combat 18. You signed a police warning for this.
You also signed a police warning for harassing Patsy. This is all on record Sean.
2)You are the sole poster here writing ABOUT yourself under aliases. Nobody is fooled. Your hatred is transparent in all your posts
3)You have a serious mental problem, Sean.
DF·- Didn't take you long, did it "Flossie" (aka Florence King), to stick your unwelcome oar in on something that does not concern you in the slightest. Are you that hard up for something to do in America that you have to search the net for anything to do with SM?
For heaven's sake woman, get a life!· - "Who are you Farrant? I mean inside? You are a black souled man who has contributed little to nothing ... Do you really think anybody cares about you or your imagined experiences? Your jealousy is so obvious that anybody can see it. You despise Bishop Manchester as he stands for everything you can only dream of being. ... The only thing you serve is your own soul and its full of hate and malice. You recruit the weak minded and gullible and play the folk hero to impress them."
~ Peroxide· - "'Craig Adams' - who also posted as 'Hulk Hogan' on Eckers defunct board. A barely literate idiot. Perhaps you took one knock too many in those rubgy games Craig?
How does it feel to be on the receiving end for once, Craig? Maybe it wasnt the rubgy. Perhaps it was that incident outside of 3 One 7′ in Frognal?" Does Hannah still work near Chloe's? See what I mean? Comfortable?
Time to crawl back under your rock Craig."
~ Peroxide's Touch ("theunhumantouch" can be found on wordpress)· - "Barbara Green - who appears to change sides more often than a confused opportunist. Constantly harping on about her pathetic Robin Hood delusions and visions and trying to turn every conversation in her direction. Desperate for publicity and fame and now hawking her book 'Ladies of the Night' which sounds more red light district than serious nursing. Farrant was obviously desperate for friends, which is why he no doubt allowed you back into his inner circle."
~ Peroxide (theunhumantoch)· - "Does 'good' mean the harrasment of a man and his wife? Does 'good' mean the uploading and sharing of a mans work? Does 'good' mean publishing images of a mans family home? Does 'good' mean allowing a convicted criminal a heroic platform? The internet can do without platforms for criminals, which is exactly what you are Farrant. If you ever knew the concept of truth, it has sadly been removed from your mental capacity through years of alcohol abuse."
~ Peroxide (theunhumantoch on wordpress)· - "Test" ... ? ? ?
How many times have we seen that on forums invaded by "Greenwych"?
Oh dear, that's rather given the game away I'm afraid, Barbara Green.
My apologies to Patricia Langley (who calls herself "Columbine" on various boards). I was thrown by Barbara Green signing off with "Love as always, C."
I should have realised that Barbara Green of Brighouse is, of course, her own biggest fan. There could be no other. Barbara Green's dig at Miss Fearnley also gives the game away. - I had no idea that "Columbine" aka Patricia Langley of Feltham, Middx, was the number one fan of Yorkshire's own Barbara Green.
Patricia Langley, of course, would have only been aged 10 when the Highgate Vampire first hit the headlines in 1970 and is nowadays a self-proclaimed witch, medium and engager in tantric sex magic. However, anyone who has seen her will be amazed at how she manages the latter. Her calling someone else a "bloated imbecile" smacks of the pot calling the kettle black.· - "I have read both The Highgate Vampire & From Satan To Christ and found them utterly inspiring! Bishop Manchester has shown the world that we live in a spiritual battlefield between Good & Evil and that love prayer and Faith In Christ is the strongest weapon and armour we have to win. These books show the darker side of our universe and the dangers of dabbling in the occult and dark powers and serve as ample warning to take up the armour of God."
~ Rodrigo De Luna, Traditional Roman Catholic
- "A most interesting and useful addition to the literature of the subject."
~ Reverend Basil Youdell, Literary Editor Orthodox News
"This book will certainly be read in a hundred years time, two hundred years time, three hundred years time - in short, for as long as mankind is interested in the supernatural. It has the most genuine power to grip. Once you have started to read it, it is virtually impossible to put it down."
~ Lyndall Mack (aka Jennie Gray), Editor of Udolpho magazine - Comment on the hardback, illustrated edition of "The Highgate Vampire" (Gothic Press, 1991):
"I am very impressed by the body of scholarship you have created. Seán Manchester is undoubtedly the father of modern vampirological research."
~ John Godl, paranormal researcher and writer, Australia
"Seán Manchester is to be congratulated on this fine piece of research work which I confess to enjoying to the extreme."
~ Professor Devendra P Varma, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada - As to the question of whether a vampire still exists at Highgate Cemetery - well - I can only say yes it does.
~ DF, In Search of the Highgate Vampire video (1998)
Just to be factual, as far as this is possible; I do not - and never have - accepted the existence of vampires.
~ DF, James Randi Educational Foundation Forum (9 May 2007)
"The Highgate case should not be allowed to become clouded or influenced by any who have no knowledge of events."
~ DF (personal website) - Having read Seán Manchester's "The Highgate Vampire" (Gothic Press 1991) which I found to be the best written and most informative book on the subject, people did not know what to expect from Mr Farrant's "Beyond the Highgate Vampire". Barely a dozen pages deal with the matter of the Highgate Vampire in this very small, stapled booklet. Mr Farrant includes copyright infringed images plus lots of infringed text from "The Highgate Vampire" on which he is reliant to market his own dreary pamphlet.
- Barrie Simmon: "I joined a macabre hunt among the desecrated graves and tombs for the vampire of Highgate Cemetery. David, 24, was all set, kitted out with all the gear required by any self-respecting vampire hunter. Clutched under his arm, in a Sainsburys carrier bag, he held the tools of his trade. There was a cross made out of two bits of wood tied together with a shoelace and a stake to plunge through the heart of the beast. Vampire hunting is a great art."
(London Evening News 16/10/70) - This contradicts your claim in a letter to the Ham & High 6/2/70 where you state you saw it on THREE occasions. That notwithstanding, in the Ham & High 6/3/70 you make absolutely clear your intent: "What I have recently learnt all points to the vampire theory as being the most likely answer. Should this be so, I for one am prepared to pursue it, taking whatever means might be necessary so that we can all rest." Seán Manchester warned against your intention in a TV programme transmitted 13/3/70.
- Laurence Picethly: "Have you ever seen this vampire?"
David Farrant: "I have seen it, yes. I saw it last February, and saw it on two occasions."
Laurence Picethly: "What was it like?"
David Farrant: "It took the form of a tall, grey figure, and it seemed to glide off the path without making any noise."
The TV interview with you ends at this point. It was preceded by your reconstruction of what you were doing on the night of your arrest, ie hunting the vampire with a cross and stake. - Laurence Picethly: "In spite of attempts by the cemetery owners to bar him, Farrant still maintain a regular vigil around the catacombs in hope of sighting either the vampire or a meeting of Satanists."
David Farrant: "We [sic] have been keeping watch in the cemetery since my court case ended and we [sic] still found signs of their ceremonies."
Laurence Picethly: Have you ever seen this vampire?
David Farrant: I have seen it, yes. I saw it last February, and saw it on two occasions. - Your second interview, Mr Farrant, was broadcast on BBC television late at night on 15 October 1970 on the 24 hours programme.
Laurence Picethly: "On August the seventeenth, Farrant decided to pay a midnight visit to the cemetery to combat the vampire once and for all. He armed himself with a cross and stake, and crouched between the tombstones, waiting. But that night police, on the prowl for vandals, discovered him. He was charged with being in an enclosed space for an unlawful purpose." - This is was you claimed, Mr Farrant, in your brief first television interview transmitted at 6.00pm on 13 March 1970 on the Today (Thames Television) programme:
Sandra Harris: Did you get any feeling from it? Did you feel that it was evil?
David Farrant: Yes, I did feel it was evil because the last time I actually saw its face, and it looked like it had been dead for a long time.
Sandra Harris: What do you mean by that?
David Farrant: Well, I mean it certainly wasnt human.
- The images were already on the net, including BG's MSN group. Anyone could copy them, and that's wehere Ian Gomeche found them. You, Barbara Green and, at the time, Catherine Fearnley were in league with Mr Gomeche who was a moderator (part of the administration) of a Neo-Nazi forum which attacked Seán Manchester and put his image on their site together with libellous allegations provided by you. This same Neo-Nazi board published Seán Manchester's full address which again was provided by you.
- Predictably Mr Farrant answered none of SLITN's questions which in itself is an answer, ie he does not want the "rift" (something of an understatement I would have thought) to be "healed" because without the Highgate Vampire to milk and Seán Manchester to hate this man has nothing.
As for Seán Manchester making "untrue allegations", where and what allegations?
Remember, Mr Farrant, you came here before anyone else to abuse Seán Manchester. Do you really expect to do so with impunity? - Incidentally, just to give a further lie to your untruthful remarks about IG, Sean, he did not even know who Catherine was when he telephoned her after getting her number from YOUR post on the Combat 18 Forum. Catherine referred him to myself, and even then, he had not even heard of her publicly. I had to explain that she was my Secretary and in no way implicated in YOUR malicious post. If he didn't even know of Catherine, just how could he have posted her name and picture up?
David Farrant· - Not a bad idea Craig. I think we could sell a few DVD's as well complete with transcripts for the hard of hearing. Actually that a good idea. Maybe his-mother-in-law wouldike one!
David
PS How's your job in the wharhouse?!?! - Simple. If you don't want your untrue allegations to be answered Sean, then just stop making them! That's all you have to do. Its as simple as that!
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - Have you completely lost it, Sean? That is YOUR distorted version of what I said. I said that the tall black apparition had been seen on at least 3 occasion (by other witnesses). I did NOT say it was a 'giant dead body with no legs'. Again, this is YOUR distorted version. I said that the entity appeared to be floating above the ground and that it had a 'deathly-like face': which is slightly different from your twisted version. Is that the best you can do Sean?!
David Farrant, Patron YRHS 
I nevertheless have some questions for David Farrant, hopefully without him getting into the tedious game of who's who.
My questions are:
What has he done to try and heal the rift with Bishop Manchester?
Does he want to heal the rift?
If he does, what is he prepared to do? What would he like to see happen?
If he does not, where does he think this will lead? Bearing in mind his age, does he want to carry on bickering until death comes knocking? Does he believe the public cares?·- Thus an eternal game of ping pong ensues with Farrant identifying himself because he wants to be identified in an attempt to keep his profile visible to a public that lost all interest in him over thirty years ago. Who really cares about any of this?
Farrant compulsively regurgitates allegations in a desperate bid to make himself appear in a light different to the one he correctly fears the public might have of him. The other side feed his hunger when they should know better and starve it.· - When Catherine first approached me in 2003 about this business I told her I did not want her 'caught in the middle of it' and she should still have this in writing. She chose to get involved quite willingly but when she informed you she had agreed to be my secretary that's when you started your vengeful campaign against her. If she says any differently now, it is only to use you to 'get back' at myself because she felt she had been 'dumped' 'Hell hath no fury' etc.
David Farrant, Patron yRHS - That's right Sean, it WAS cleared up to the satifaction of the police who used their hi-tec department to establish that the post had been made from YOUR own computer. Stop lying about that person 'hacking' into your computer. The experts could have easily told if that had been the case. You were made to sign this warning on threat of arrest in July 2004. You are a compulsive LIAR, Sean.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS
- Nobody asked you to disclose what doesn't exist in the first place. We all know about your penchant for forging items. That might also include bogus membership "files" to show reporters. What else do you fill your day doing when not posting libellous abuse about Seán Manchester and anyone you assume rightly or wrongly to be connected to him?
Miss Fearnley has already confirmed she was shown names and addresses of people who have purchased your hate-filled tracts. These you offer as members? - What about a giant dead body floating along the ground with no apparent legs which emanates evil from every fibre of its corpse-like body and a face that reveals two burning coals for eyes which apparently have the power to hypnotise anyone who sees it?
That is what you claimed to have seen as you walked past Highgate Cemetery, Mr Farrant, and not just once but three times!
Are we to believe you? Well, no, because Tony Hill admits he helped you invent this fictious story and can prove it. - You are a total liar, Mr Farrant. What would you know about the strength of support Seán Manchester enjoys, hunched as you are each day and night over your antiquated computer in a pokey bedsit?
Your forums attract NO support whatsoever beyond the handful of familiar culprits. Why do none of your "members" ever join? Seán Manchester has hundreds of members signed up in support of him on his forums. Anyone who joins will view his membership tally. This reveals which of you attract support. - Catherine Fearnley, while still your girlfriend and totally under you influence, did make a complaint to the police at YOUR instigation. They acted upon it at first and spoke to Seán Manchester, but it was subsequently cleared up to the satisfaction of the three police forces involved (overall), Miss Fearnley and Seán Manchester.
There was no complaint to the police Seán Manchester knows about regarding Patsy Langley. No warnings have been issued, but he has lodged a complaint against her. - First of all, Mr Farrant, let's establish the extent to which you understand the internet: Zero! Ian Keith Gomeche, unlike you, knew how to make it appear as though something was generated from an area when it wasn't. His trail went from his computer to a domain in Canada from which he hacked into a shared domain which included Seán Manchester's IP. Hence a complaint against the complaint was made. The following year Ian Gomeche was taken into custody in July 2005 from where he was sectioned.
- Seán Manchester put nobody's details on an extreme right-wing board, as has been subsequently proven beyond any doubt by Grampian Police who established that IT buff Ian Gomeche was entirely responsible. Gomeche at the time was a moderator on the Nazi board to which you refer and he was also in telephone and email contact with you, Mr Farrant, throughout this nasty business. He was also in contact with Barbara Green, but to a much lesser extent. Mr Gomeche was brought to court and sectioned.
- Let us establish one thing: I am NOT Seán Manchester, but am acquainted with him.
John Pope's fiancee was a friend of a close friend of Seán Manchester. Pope's fiancee asked her friend is she knew anyone who could take the wedding photographs at St Joseph's Church. Seán Manchester's close friend asked him if he would do it as a personal favour. He answered that it would be on condition that Pope had continued to put his satanic past behind him now that he was marrying a Roman Catholic. - That does not really need an answer Sean when you are subconsciously talking about yourself. Just nobody believes your claims. For example, 'staking a vampire' which you then incinerated with a can of petrol (conveniently leaving no evidence!)and another which had turned into a 'giant spider'. Grow up Sean. Children could rell better stories at kindergarton!
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - I am not disclosing Society membership details to yourself, Sean, to protect members from harassment. Both Patsy and DM were present when I showed Catherine the membership files. All signed, some with photographs and giving personal details. There were 374 members then. Your 'supporters' consist only of 'Brother Keith, yourself and your wife . . . and Catherine now, of course. Which makes just 3 if my maths are correct.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - By your own admission yesterday, Sean, you said that Pope's wife had requested you to take photographs at their wedding. You did.
You have now exposed yourself as a TOTAL LIAR from your own lips! Pope was a close associate of yourself and you used him for no end of your publicity stunts. You were exposed for one of these by the Sunday People in 1977 who called you a 'hoaxer' and 'a liar'. That just about sums it up.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS
- PART 2
The police investigated fully and confirmed that this posting had been sent via. your personal email address and the IP was of your own computer. On threat of arrest, you were made to sign a written Warning by the Dorset police in July 2004.
Only a year later, you were made to sign a similiar Warning by the Dorset Police for sending harassing emails to Patsy who lived in London. These facts remain on record. Suggest you stop, Sean, or you might well end up in prison.
David Farrant - PART 1
It was yourself who put up peoples' personal details and photographs on an extreme Right Wing message Board (Combat 18). You gave their private addresses and phone numbers and published an accompanying screed to the effect these people were all Left Wing informers. The people you named thus (in full) were Catherine, Kev and Gareth and myself. Catherine was extremely upset and both she and myself reported the matter to the CID naming yourself as being responsible...
David Farrant, YRHS· - You work in a computer warehouse, Mr Adams.
This was found on the net:
"Whats amusing about you Craig, is that you werent quick enough to cover your online tracks. Facebook and Bebo made for very interesting reading, whilst your profiles were set to public. The fact that you have now set them to private makes no difference and it wont suprise you to know that I saved your details - location, pictures, comments and otherwise. How does it feel to be on the receiving end for once, Craig?" - Another question, Mr Farrant, which you have totally avoided is where are all your members? You have claimed down the years to have hundreds of members in your so-called "British Psychic and Occult Society" (created in 1983) and your equally improbable "Highgate Vampire Society" (created in 1997), but where are they?
Whenever you have opened message boards and forums in either the "BPOS" or "HVS" names no supposed members have materialised. Where are the mythical "374" members you brag about? - You have avoided answering absolutely everything, Mr Farrant.
For example, you were asked whether your repeated claims on television and in newspapers to have witnessed a seven foot floating spectre with burning red eyes which appeared to you to have been "dead for a long time" and emanated "evil", is any more plausible than a traditional vampire, bearing in mind that vampires have been recorded down the ages as having the ability to transform into other creatures, both animal and insect? - Believe you, Mr Farrant? No juries believed you. No judges believed you. No magistrates believed you. No journalists believed you. The police did not believe you. And the only members of the public to have been duped are damaged, weak, vulnerable or similary diabolical individuals as yourself.
I have "cut & pasted" nothing and it is you who is constantly going around in circles, repeating the same falsehoods over and over. I am surprised that Barbara Green has not joined in as she usual does. - Than you for providing a genesis to the ice cream van libel which Mr Farrant has been disseminating in his poisonous tracts and on the internet for years. No doubt John Pope will deny all knowledge when he is pinned down on it. But it's good to trace these malicious falsehoods to their source.
John Pope, a self-confessed bisexual Satanist with a serious sexual assault conviction, was and remains Mr Farrant's best mate. Seán Manchester was not Pope's "best man" or even a guest at his wedding. - I am NOT Seán Manchester and claiming I am in order to distract attention from the issues will not make it so, Mr Farrant.
Nobody knew you in 1965, Mr Farrant. I am talking about from thirty to forty years later when you have been seen outdoors hobbling along Archway Road with an extremely yellow complexion. This is usually associated with sustained alcohol abuse which causes liver damage. There have also been occasions when you have been interviewed when your skin had a distinct orange hue. - So you do not deny that you threatened the two policeman who arrested the only known member of your "coven" who was charged and found guilty of molesting a young boy?
As for duping and Nazi hoaxes, didn't you dupe the same person into allegedly "raising the devil" for publicity in the press and tried to board the Nazi bandwagon when his Neo-Nazi connections, which he has never denied, came to light in the press?
Stop lying, Mr Farrant, about matters you alone have distorted down the years. - You have boasted here that you are not anonymous, yet every one of you illegal posts on Don Ecker's forum you wrote under the pseudonym "Hulk Hogan", never once identifying yourself properly. It makes no difference because the police were monitoring you and your IP was noted. You strayed into very dangerous territory when you tried to put Seán Manchester and his wife at risk.
Nobody "begged" for anything, Mr Adams. You were asked to have the courage to face the man you libel behind his back.
- You ARE going around in circles, Sean. As yet you have not asked me anything; just repeated your usual 'cut & paste' nonsense that has no relevance to this Robin Hood thread. I am not surprised that BG wants to avoid being in the middle of your highly malicious postings. Can you really blame her after you and your new-found accomplise have done to her already? So forget BG and just stick with me! She will soon say if anything I have posted is inaccurate, believe you me!
David Farrant, YRHS - That person was your associate, Sean. You duped him into your Nazi hoax back in 1977. You took publicity photos of him having a 'duel' with you in a graveyard in 1974 and you were later best man and photographer at his wedding in 1987. You frequently used this person for publicity purposes when you wern't drinking coffee in the coffee shop in Highgate Village. Stop lying, Sean.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - I was not talking about that person, Sean. YOU brought him into it. I was talking about your vile innuendo against Chris and your threat to make this public in the newspapers. You have conveniently taken that the wrong way.
The person you refer to is NOT a paedophile, as you well know. He admits to being a homosexual but, so what? So do hundreds of others. Sorry, Sean, forgot. You don't like homosexuals, do you!?
David Farrant. - Innocent? You are joking, right? The man had been deceiving clergy and laity alike for years that he was normal. The Ecclesiastical Law Society provided Seán Manchester with a massive file of documents that are irrefutable. Some of these documents can be viewed online. Others are available upon request. Once Seán Manchester was convinced this man was a suspected paedophile with those connections he began the process to have him excommunicated and anathematised with the support of many others.
- Catherine will be aware that you are lying, Sean. And in turn, the God she claims to worship will be aware that SHE is lying if she now tries to deny this. In fact, it wouldn't really surprise me as she has already tried to deceive her Priest.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS· - All you do is fabricate nonsense in order to avoid issues. Where is Barbara Green? She does not appear to be backing your lies on this occasion. I am not going to go around in circles repeating what has already been stated in order to help you create a smoke-screen. I know nothing about any book, only talk of a book that was abandoned almost as soon as it was dreamt up. Miss Fearnley has had no contact with Seán Manchester apart from posting once on his contact forum when she first left you.
- Then there is the fact that you were jailed for two years for threatening two policemen who arrested another of your paedophile chums in 1973. Your so-called "occult lieutenant" was found guilty of molesting a minor. Astonishingly, as recounted in your own newsletter "Suspended in Dusk", edited by Kev Demant at the time, you appointed this convicted paedophile to the position of "head of the junior department" of your supposed "Highgate Vampire Society" of which you were the only other member.
- You colluded with this pervert to do harm to Seán Manchester and his ministry. All of this was witnessed by the deacon Ian and, of course, Catherine Fearnley who was also present. Seán Manchester received overwhelming evidence from the Ecclesiastical Law Society that this elderly man was a dangerous pervert with many paedophile associations. He was in the final stages of excommunicating him when you struck up a relationship with the old bugger and entered into a malicious conspiracy with him.
- Not 'deadly quiet' Sean. I just won't make malicious and untrue slurs about innocent people which you are trying to do. You couldn't much lower down in the gutter if you tried.
David Farrant, Patron, YRHS - Not so, Sean. Catherine sent you a copy of the book, so you are just lying once again. For somebody who wants to 'steer clear of my' she's got a funny way of showing it! She asked Barbara to edit this book and I was the 'star' of it! Barbara obviously read it. And Barbara knows that Catherine sent a copy to you Sean. Catherine also told Barbara what she said to the Priest. She gave him the impression that I was still involved in Wicca, which was a lie, when it was herself who was
David Farrant·
- You have gone deadly quiet over Chris Coghill's support for your vendetta against a man who has always campaigned against paedophiles, particularly paedophile clergy. Seán Manchester's website naming and shaming paedophile priests was disabled on 21 June 2002 because of complaints received by his ISP from you. When, after receiving evidence, he excommunicated a suspected paedophile bishop who has strong paedophile connections, you instantly supported the pervert and invited him into your home.·
- Still trying to hurt innocent people I see, Sean, by your vile smears.
Catherine Fearnley IS in contact with you. It was NOT just once. She wrote a vindictive book about myself after I had 'dumped' her which she emailed yourself for approval. It was never published. Pity in a way!
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - As I have already confirmed near the beginning of this confrontation, I am both acquainted with and in contact with Seán Manchester. Catherine Fearnley is not.
Whatever Miss Fearnley does is her business. It does not involve Seán Manchester and hopefully will not involve you, Mr Farrant.
There is no reason for Miss Fearnley and Seán Manchester to have any contact, and they do not.
You are revealing a paranoid state of mind, Mr Farrant, which is something you ought to seek to correct. - If you are 'not you', Sean, then how could you possibly know about Catherine's communications with 'Sean Manchester'. You keep giving yourself away, Sean. You really are pathetic!
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - Don't be such a pathetic ignoramus, Mr Farrant. How many times does it have to be explained to you? Miss Fearnley once wrote a lot of things on her blogs and forums. She also contributed to other forums.
That's how I know that she does not communicate with Seán Manchester, plus the fact that Seán Manchester himself has confirmed this.
You keep these irrelevant matters going in order to avoid the real issues. Not once have you answered a question, nor will you while able to obfuscate. - Catherine won't get the chance to state anything under Oath again, Sean (which she already has done about yourself) as neither the Courts or the police will entertain her again.
I DID pay full maintenace for the upkeep of my children. That can be checked. You paid nothing but 'did a runner' to avoid this. That can also be checked. It is all there in the Court papers.
David Farrant, Patron, YRHS· - You paid absolutely no maintenance whatsoever, as confirmed by your wife at the time. It can be checked, Mr Farrant; just bear that in mind. You libellous remarks about the man you obsess over, envy and hate merely reveals your pathetic agenda which only those as perverted as yourself will collude in.
One thing is for absolute certain, Mr Farrant, and that is that neither the courts nor the police will ever entertain you again; except at Her Majesty's pleasure.
I hope you like porridge! - Catherine lied to the police, Sean, who confirmed this and will still confirm it. She was encouraged to do so by yourself. She also deceived her own Priest about her active involvement in Wicca.
I notice you have gone deadly quiet about her book about myself which she sent you for approval. Are you now trying to deny this as well Sean? Well?
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - I am NOT Seán Manchester. Catherine Fearnley was not "encouraged" to do anything by Seán Manchester with whom she is not in contact. How would you of all people, Mr Farrant, know what transpired between Miss Fearnley and her priest? You were not there. Neither was I. Whatever she chooses to do or not do is her decision alone. She just wants to remove all memory of you from her mind. Who would really want to relive a nightmare? Her priest, it has been revealed, wants her to steer clear of you.
- I have not gone "deadly quiet" about any proposed book because I know nothing about any book. I do not believe such a book exists in the making. When Miss Fearnley first freed herself from your evil clutches she spoke about writing such a thing on her blog, but on the same board I seem to recall her abandoning it because you are such a boring subject and she just wants to forget everything to do with you. Who can blame her? You are a paranoid head-case, Mr Farrant, that everyone should avoid.
- It is you are trying to distract from the real issues, Sean. The Court documents that Catherine brought to London for me clearly show a case reference number and enclose a report about the adoption of your two children by your ex-wife's new husband. They also site your failure to pay ordered maintenance for their upkeep.
If Catherine is now lying about their origin, this says little for her current unstable state of mind. Love turned to hate more accurately.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS· - I am NOT Seán Manchester. Catherine Fearnley has stated, saying she will do so under oath if need be, that she received documents which bore your very recognisable writing on them in pencil via Rob Milne's email address.
Your children (both male) born in 1967 and 1969, Mr Farrant, were adopted by your ex-wife's new husband. You have not paid a penny toward maintenance for their upkeep and you have not once asked to see them throughout the intervening forty years. These are the real facts! - They are NOT facts 'verefiable on public record', Sean. They are only further distortions of events that you have twisted in your self-published books. Just like you are attempting to do here, in fact.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - You do not know what your're talking about Sean. All you do is paste stuff from Google and try to claim the credit. You know nothing about true Wicca; still less about genuine Christianity which you distort beyond all recognition.
The Feminine Principle that you seem to condemn, is prevaelant in Catholicism also remember. Only there it is symbolised by the Virgin Mary. You truly show your true ignorance when you try to talkn about such things, Sean.
David Farrant, Patron, YRHS - Let's be clear, Mr Farrant, I am NOT Seán Manchester, do not "paste stuff from Google", do not claim to be expert on anything and do not condemn what you say I condemn.
You, on the other hand, know nothing about anything, have pretended to be a "high priest of witchcraft" in the past when you were nothing of the sort, have contradicted everything you have ever stated about your obsession, and should be condemned for the malice you generate and always have throughout your miserable life. - I'd ignore that Craig. Sean's usual tactic is to accuse people of being on drugs if tell the truth about him. Its sheer hateful desperation, but hate is what makes up his real persona which he's shown everybody here.
You've done an excellent job of showing people your real character, Sean.
'Bishop'!?, I don't somehow think so!
David Farrant, Patron, YRHS - I wouldn't ignore it if I was you, Mr Adams. You know what the truth is regarding your use of illegal drugs without having to be told. Enough said.
Mr Farrant has even ensnared actor Chris Coghill (who plays paedophile Tony King in the soap Eastenders) to assist his hate campaign. So him duping someone like youself is almost understandable. Mr Coghill and his actress girlfriend sympathise with witchcraft and occultism; Chris Coghill visiting Highgate Cemetery with Mr Farrant some time back. - More information given to you by Catherine, Sean, which, as usual, you are trying to distort. Seems she's becoming quite an expert at trying to hurt innocent people since coming under your evil influence.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - I have no idea what you are talking about, Mr Farrant.
The "information", as you call it, is out there. It does not come from Miss Fearnley. Photographs were taken of you and Chris Coghill in Highgate Cemetery. Now he's playing a paedophile in a popular TV soap, and we all know about your continued support for real paedophiles, don't we?
Somehow I don't think it's going to look especially good when Chris Coghill's connection to you, Mr Farrant, becomes known in the wider media.
Whoops! - I think you should email Seán Manchester to get things sorted out before you end up in jail like your chum Mr Farrant. Unless it is the drugs talking, you have absolutely no bone of contention with Seán Manchester who has never contacted you despite your protestations otherwise.
All you appear to manage is libellous abuse and threatening behaviour, ie Ecker's forum, without any apparent motive apart from being under the obvious influence of Mr Farrant. What favours do you owe this old man?
- Drugs are seriously effecting your mind, Mr Adams, as revealed in every post you have made here. Perhaps you should stay off them? Don't try and deny you take illegal substances. It's been confirmed by one of your "friends". You also share Mr Farrant's penchant for alcohol abuse and harassment.
Yes, I am anonymous, like most people on the internet, but Seán Manchester is not. He can be contacted very easily by adding "BishopSeanManchester" or just "SeanManchester" after the MSN group prefix. - If what you are saying is true you would have no problem proving it, would you? Problem is it's just the malcontented ravings of a dysfunctional young man who should be thinking beyond doing drugs, having indiscriminate sex and night-clubbing. I can understand how you might not be happy with your lot stuck where you are in Nuneaton, but you really shouldn't take it out on others. So Mr Farrant's bedsit is convenient when you visit London's sordid nightlife but what are you doing with an old man?
- Do not attribute your own actions to Seán Manchester who has never indulged in your despicable behaviour.
It is interesting you cite Barbara Green because she has posted her private address and telephone number all over the internet, largely because she uses it as her "publishing address" for her pamphlets.
Patricia Langley has posted where she lives on the internet in the recent past, but, after collaboration with Mr Farrant (where she openly supports his vendetta) took to hiding it. - Yes. That's right Craig. At least you don't withhold your identity. He does. "The Highgate Vampire"! Can anybody really believe that?!? Well, everybody knows its really him now, anyway.
David (Farrant)· - Strange, isn't it Mr Farrant, how you want to distract attention all the time from the real issues, eg your illegal activities, theft, fraud, harassment, threats and malicious actions?
You cannot answer any question raised or put to you because the truth reveals you for what you are. The public saw through you a long time ago which is why you have no support and are reliant on calling upon a 28-year-old disgruntled warehouseman in Nuneaton who listens to trance music to do your dirty work. - It becomes my business when you begin making allegations about my first wife which you did right here. Short memory, Sean??
- Thet are not allegations, Mr Farrant. They are facts verifiable on public record, eg books such as From Satan To Christ (Holy Grail, 1988) and The Vampire Hunter's Handbook (Gothic Press, 1997), and supported by all concerned including yourself in a privately recorded interview which you agreed to give in 1978. If you are going to invent things about the man you hate, we might as well introduce a few personal, trie and verifiable facts about you. If you dish it out, Mr Farrant, you must take it.
- Are you now claiming that Tony Hill did not run off with your wife in 1968 and that you didn't become bankrupt and were not evicted in 1969?
Did you not accept Mr Hill's invitation to sleep and live in his small coal bunker from August 1969 until August 1970?
It was you who introduced your wife into the public arena when you called her as a witness in your criminal trials at the Old Bailey.
She revealed you to be someone who just mucked about in Highgate Cemetery after the pubs closed. - You say that Catherine absolutely denies what I am claiming. Slipped up once again,Sean! How would you know that unless you were in contact with her?
Just for the record, Sean, I have never done any harm to Catherine - nor would I. I am publishing the book, yes, but that has to be done to publicly show how she lied to the police AT YOUR INSTIGATION. You encouraged her which is why I don't take that too personally. Her public lies though will be set straight.
David Farrant Patron YRHS - I happen to know because, unlike you, I take the trouble to read what people say on forums.
You are paranoid, Mr Farrant, and can only ever show the focus of your all-consuming hatred in everything you say and do.
Catherine Fearnley has made it absolutely clear that the document made to look as though it was sent by a supposed "son" also bore your writing in pencil on it, which had not been successfully erased, and was received via an email address belonging to your collaborator Rob Milne.
- Why don't you tell us about how you and David Farrant conspired to have clandestine photographs taken of a property 120 miles away from where you are to endanger the lives of the occupants instead of repeating falsehood based on Mr Farrant's doctored tapes from over a quarter of a century ago?
You, Craig Adams, really are a sick stalker as revealed on Ecker's forum where you made hundreds of posts about Seán Manchester and his wife, knowing nothing more than the libel provided by Mr Farrant. - I did pay maintenance after my divorce, Sean, and this is on record. You did not and quickly 'changed addresses' to avoid doing so. The Court paper-work was sent to Catheerine Fearnley by one of your own sons and she was also in contact by email. I shall soon be publishing this material to repudiate the very unChristian lies you have both been telling. What else can you expect from hyporcrites, I suppose.
David Farrant, Patron, YRHS - Just for the record, Sean, you tried to publicly deny that you were the real father of your two sons which was the reasn one of them sent the Court paper-work to Catherine and was in contact with her by email. She gave these communications to myself for publication as also other communications confirming that your 'religious credentials' were not genuine.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - Just for the record, Mr Farrant, what business is any of this of yours?
You are the real father of two sons, neither of whom you have ever paid a penny of maintenance toward or have ever bothered to visit. There is no record of you paying any maintenance and you will not be able to produce any. Just hot air.
By publishing malicious falsehood of this kind you are making enemies (and I do not mean Seán Manchester) and stirring up trouble for yourself that you really would not want. - You are a liar of the first order, Mr Farrant, as the courts and public at large have long since come to realise. Miss Fearnley absolutely denies what you are claiming. What she states on a forum is that the doctored papers came from you and no-one else. It was you and you alone who claimed their origin. All parties concerned deny this. Miss Fearnley believes that your associate Rob Milne masqueraded as a would-be "son" of Seán Manchester to try and convince her by email of the papers source.
- Gareth Medway is a member of the Fellowship of Isis (founded at the Spring Equinox of 1976in Ireland by Olivia Robertson, her brother Lawrence, and his wife, Pamela Durdin-Robertson). This group worships the goddess, the feminine principle, and are governed by the witchcraft calendar of ritual celebrations. Witchcraft is not a formal religion with a set doctrine like Judaism or Christiantiy and can take various forms, the Fellowship of Isis being one of them in methodology, ritual and worship.
- You blamed ex-girlfriend Martine de Sacy when she exposed you in the press for using infamy and fabricated self-publicity as a form of compensation for your sexual impotence. She went on the run to France when you took the newspaper to court. You were awarded derogatory damages of just £50. The newspaper were unable to produce their star witness Martine de Stacy.
You blamed ex-girlfriend Catherine Fearnley for a host of things when she exposed your hate campaign against Seán Manchester. - I did not blame Martine; how could I? She did after all catch me in bed with her flatmate. To get her 'revenge', she told lies to the newspaper. I blamed them for printing the nonsense, yes, so I took them to Court and won.
At YOUR instigation, Catherine Fearnley published similar allegations on the Internet and gave a fabricated statement to the police. Her comments were proved to be false. I have never 'blamed' her because she was totally under YOUR evil influence.
David Farrant YRHS - Well you would say that wouldn't you? Though it's curious how so many ex-girlfriends say the same thing. You call them "lies", yet these ex-girlfriends didn't even know one another but arrived at the same conclusion nonetheless.
Again, you would say what you're saying about Miss Fearnley who has had no contact with Seán Manchester since the one occasion she asked his forgiveness for assisting you with your hate campaign. Your absurd claim that Seán Manchester "instigated" anything is a lie. - More transference, eh, Mr Farrant? If anyone is trapped in the past it is you. Just look at your own websites, forums and self-published pamphlets. They all dwell on nothing but the same old obsessions from decades ago.
Let's face it, Mr Farrant, if you subtract The Highgate Vampire and Seán Manchester from your agenda nothing remains. That is all you have.
Who really cares about your stupid floating giant spectre with red eyes? Nobody actually believes you saw it? Most of all you don't!
All Comments (320) see all
- You seem to forget, Mr Farrant, that the facts about 1968/1969 have been in print, eg From Satan To Christ (Holy Grail, 1988); The Vampire Hunter's Handbook (Gothic Press, 1997), for quite a while. Anybody could know about them who has read those books. Plus they have been around on the internet for a long time. As for your convenient transference, it was you, Mr Farrant, who did not pay your wife any maintenance after she left you in 1969 with the two children whom you have never seen since.
- Do you not understand that people communicate, eg Tony Hill who does know about your wife, talks to people and they proceed to also communicate to others. Also, these matters have been openly discussed on forums previously. You are someone of exceptionally low intelligence, Mr Farrant, which would explain your life and what has become of it in many ways. The demons you harbour make you appear more devious that you would erstwhile be. Witness your classic transference technique now in evidence.
- Others present at the Kirklees grave on that April evening in 2005 say otherwise. Nobody needs to be undressed, partly or otherwise, for it to be a witchcraft ritual. There are many witches who eschew using witchcraft as an excuse to take clothes off.
The video made by Red Monkey confirms that the nature of the publicity stunt was a pagan ceremony using witchcraft symbolism and accoutrements. The photographs also confirm this to be so. Gareth Medway is a member of the Fellowship of Isis. - Isn't it rather sad and pathetic that David Farrant, someone now approaching 63, is still prattling on about something he attempted to deceive the press and public over four decades ago; a man who felt so insecure he craved publicity at any price and paid the ultimate penalty when his inflated ego distorted reality to the extent that he thought he could frighten witnesses, frighten juries, dismiss his lawyer and take on the judge at the Old Bailey. He is an archetypal schizoidal personality.
- Why don't you tell us how you go about stealing other people's copyright material by publishing it on the internet?
Why don't you tell us, Mr Adams, how you try to put people's lives at risk by revealing their private address, uploading images of where they live with incitements of hatred comprising pages of malicious falsehood?
You are pathetic loser, Mr Adams, who is young enough to be Mr Farrant's grandson, yet you feel the need to act like his partner in crime and fight his battles. - You are a liar and a cowardly one. Have the courage to put your money where your mouth is and come out into the open, Craig Adams (if that is your real name). You are completely anonymous, hide your whereabouts and visual identity. Yet you upload someone else's private address together with images of their home and incitements of hatred. You are a coward. You havn't called any police station. Why not contact Seán Manchester (you have his email) and provide a means for the police to reach you?
- How can he expose something that didn't exist in the first place? The supposed promotional poster supplied by Mr Farrant is doctored from material about an unpublished book titled "The Vampire Exhumed" which became "The Highgate Vampire" upon release. All this is documented. The people Don Ecker has been duped into believing are Seán Manchester and the female you identify are obviously not them, as anyone can see for themselves. There was no film. It is another of Mr Farrant's fabrications.
- On one point discussed here, the ritual at Robin Hood's grave, I can speak about with certainty as it was led by myself. It was not a 'witchcraft' ceremony, but a healing and blessing rite conducted on ancient Greek lines. No-one was even partly undressed. A video was made which can prove the truth of this. Given the gross distortion of the facts that have been made about this here, one cannot trust the truth of what the same indvidual says about anything.
Gareth J. Medway (posted by D.F.) - I have never blamed an ex-girlfriend for anything, Sean. I challenge you to produce one quote here where I ever have done. Repudiating vindictive allegations is very far from 'blaming' anybody.
So, go ahead and show me.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS - Isn't it rather sad and pathetic that a man approaching 63 is still prattling on about something he attempted to deceive people over some four decades ago; a man who felt so insecure in himself he craved publicity at any price and payed the ultimate price when it got out of hand? Such a man is David Farrant who has never kept his story consistent from one year to the next. He began wearing Christian symbols, including a Catholic rosary, and before you know it he was a a "high priest of witches".
- Yes, it is very sad and pathetic, Sean, to be so entrapped in the distant past which you have clearly demonstrated you are.
Who really cares about your stupid vampire (sorry, meant 'vampires' - forgot the 'giant spider'!), only yourself. Nobody really believes you staked a vampire - or ever intended to!
David Farrant, patron YRHS
David (Farrant)
Why don't you practice on your wife instead? She likes dressing up in heavy armour! In fact, she looks positively dangerous holding that spiked cudgel. Wouldn't like to get that in a sensative place! But come to thnk of it, that wouldn't have much effect on you, would it?!
Yours for now,
David
Just let me know when you're next in London again, and I'll buy a bottle of gin especially for you!
David Farrant
But what about 'beauty only being skin deep'? Somebody could have had a point there! Well, she certainly made the best of it physically in her past profession admittedly!
David Farrant, Patron, YRHS
But the police would know I had no email access before this time. Once again, Sean, you prove yourself to be a LIAR.
David Farrant, Patron YRHS
You were in collusion with Ian Gomeche to put Seán Manchester's image and full private address onto a Neo-Nazi forum that Mr Gomeche moderated. He did this because of the lies you told him and then, madman that he is, he put something up with a photograph of your girlfriend or something of that sort and tried to blame Seán Manchester. It almost worked. But not quite. Grampian police still hold all the copies of the e-mail exchanges between Ian Gomeche and yourself.
4)You are NOT a bishop, Sean. You have no Church neither do you have any 'ministery'.
5)Your attempts to defame and lie about others are totally transparent.
6)You have some personal obsession with myself, Sean, which everyone can see. There is no need for any agreement. All you need to do is to stop telling lies about myself and the Highgate case and there would then be no need to retract your lies in public. The choice is yours . . .
David Farrant, Patron YRHS
Funny how these alleged "friends" who watched a non-existent "film" (entirely invented by David Farrant) never have real names or genuine addresses and never come forward to be identified.
You're just full of it, aren't you?
Found yet another pseudonym to post lies under?
Put up or shut up. Otherwise it's just more empy rhetoric.
Funny how these alleged "friends" who watched a non-existent "film" (entirely invented by David Farrant) never have real names or genuine addresses and never come forward to be identified.
You're just full of it, aren't you?
Found yet another pseudonym to post lies under?
Put up or shut up. Otherwise it's just more empy rhetoric.